| SHARING GOOD PRACTICE IN DRUGS BATTLE
Drugs and drug related crime are amongst Europe's
greatest challenges. That is why I am delighted
that the European Union is encouraging the sharing
of good practice between countries. The EU Drugs
Strategy has published three main public health
targets, one of which is to reduce substantially
over five years the incidence of drug related
health damage and deaths. This positive way of
dealing with the growing culture of drug abuse
and reliance deserves encouragement. The drug
epidemic is a widespread problem that needs to
be tackled on a global scale. In Britain, we have
fully accepted that the way to deal with drug
dependence is to introduce risk reduction measures,
such as our very successful needle exchange programmes.
But while treatment is important, so is prevention.
That is why my colleagues and I in the European
Parliament will continue to press for more measures
to track down and stop drug traffickers who continue
to be the main target in the crackdown and fight
against drug addiction.
FRANCE GETS OFF THE BEEF HOOK
France has managed to get off the beef hook very
nicely merci by a convoluted piece of logic on
the part of the European Commission. Weeks ago,
I complained to the Commission that the French
had continued to impose a ban on British beef,
even after the European Court of Justice ruled
that they had to comply, and had then been let
off the hook of a richly deserved daily fine.
The Commission, however, have decided that, because
France eventually brought its legislation into
line with the relevant provisions of EU law, they
would withdraw further proceedings which would
have led to a fine. I am told by Commissioner
David Byrne that this was because the court would
only impose fines if the French were still not
complying with the law when a second case was
brought – and France of course complied
just before that case came before the court. At
least the Commissioner admits he is not happy
that the court was effectively precluded from
imposing fines for breaches of community law after
such a long procedure. He has therefore instigated
a review of the procedures so that the court could
still be given the opportunity in future cases
to impose fines where there have been unreasonable
delays in respecting court judgements. Good news
for the French but this leaves our farmers without
justice or compensation for the deliberate flouting
of European law which shut them out of this market
for their beef.
RESTRAINTS ON 12 YEAR OLDS
Adult seat belts will be compulsory for children
over 1.5 metres (5 ft 8 inches) tall – and
individual states have discretion to reduce this
even further, to 5 ft 2 inches - regardless of
age, if latest proposals from the European Parliament’s
Transport Committee are approved. In its original
proposal the European Commission had suggested
that children under 12 should only be allowed
to wear an adult seat belt if they had a body
mass of over 36kg (5st 9lb). Otherwise they must
be carried in a child restraint system. MEPs argued
that some children under 12 were too tall to be
carried in a child restraint system - irrespective
of their body mass – and suggested that
height should also be a criterion. As succeeding
generations of children are noticeably taller
and frequently tower above their parents by the
age of 12, it makes sense that they should be
wearing adult seat belts rather than restraints
designed for lighter, smaller children.
JOURNOS HAM IT UP
We’ve seen it all, really, the misreporting
of news from Europe. A worthy follow up to the
straight banana story, we were treated recently
to the story of the European Commission insisting
that farmers put toys in pigpens to keep the porkers
from getting bored. So intense was the coverage
that European Commissioner Beate Gminder was forced
to issue a statement aimed at putting the record
straight for irate pig farmers across Europe.
Unintentionally, the statement added to the ludicrous
nature of the story. There was no question of
forcing farmers to turn their pigpens into playpens.
The directive merely stated that pigs must be
given access to “manipulable material”.
Most farmers who keep pigs are aware of the need
for diversion and often put tyres and other materials
in the pig pen to keep them from wearying. Pity
we can’t do the same for bored journalists..
John Purvis is a member of the
Committee on Industry, External Trade Research
and Energy and Vice Chairman of the Committee
on Economic and Monetary Affairs. He can be contacted
by e-mail at
jpurvis@europarl.eu.int or visit his website
on www.scottishtorymeps.org.uk.

|